Page Turning – Three More

According to Goodreads I’m pretty much on track for my 40 books challenge this year – two days into July I finished reading the 21st book I’d started in 2017.

So with a longer review for one of those four cleared since I last dropped any summary, here are those other three rounding out the list of those completed.

Night School by Lee Child

The most recent in the Jack Reacher series and one which – perhaps as Child didn’t know where to take his one man army immediately  after Make Me – hurtles us back in time to the mid-90’s (I wouldn’t mind getting on that time machine) to a time when Reacher was still actively serving in the army.

I’m now up to nine of the twenty-one Reacher novels and I’m beginning to be able to form an impression as to which ones are strong and which ones are merely ok. For my money this one sits in the latter category.  Make Me was a real strong entry after the relative water tread of Personal and took Reacher in a direction that showed growth and potential. By heading back into the past Child removes any real sense of jeopardy and it becomes more of a “Reacher gets into fights in Germany” read than anything else. The closeness of events to those of Killing Floor mean there’s nothing revelatory about Reacher’s past offered up and Child’s method of writing without knowing where events are going is too often on display when it comes to the ‘mystery’ at the centre of events.

Let’s hope The Midnight Line is another step forward rather than more standing still. Not bad but I’d be disappointed if I’d paid anything more than the £2 this one cost me.

Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov (some spoiler)

This one had been sat on the Want-To and then the TBR list and pile for a while now. My wife got to it first and praised it and there’s no denying the regard it’s held in. I’d be gobsmacked if somebody hadn’t heard of it; its infamy probably known more than its contents.

So… do I rave about this book? Well, nobody can write like Nabokov, that’s for sure. I’d not read a line by him before now but even the first sentence is pure brilliance: “Lolita, light of my life, fire of my loins. My sin, my soul. Lo-lee-ta: the tip of the tongue taking a trip of three steps down the palate to tap, at three, on the teeth. Lo. Lee. Ta.”

The dark comedy is sublime, the character of Humbert is one for the archives and so brilliantly painted and there are times when one can’t help but feel for him and, yes, so much of this misperceived (by those who haven’t read it) novel is less about Humbert’s pursuit of his nymphet as it is about Lolita’s absolute playing and exploitation of his sickness.

BUT, here’s what stops me wanting to read this again and again in the same way I do about a book like The Master and Margarita* and maybe I am a prude, or over-thinking this but a large part of this novel is essentially Humbert on a cross-country tour of America having sex with a very under-age girl. It makes for a very uncomfortable read – especially when he points out her crying herself to sleep every night – and, yes, this is intended, yes Lo is “seduces” him and yes his revelling in such activities makes the downfall so much more dramatic  but the lengthy segues that detail the realisation of Humbert’s desires (no matter their forming and Lo’s scheming) are still just too visceral to make an enjoyable read for my tastes.

But – while I won’t necessarily read this one again – it is a hugely well written and brilliantly told story that underlines Nabokov’s importance in the literary cannon and should be read at least once but any such student of the form.


Pyramids by Terry Pratchett

Pretty much impossible to review any of Sir Pterry’s novels in anything other than adoration. I’ve mentioned before both that it would be tricky to overestimate the  importance of Terry Pratchett in my library and literary explorations  and my desire to gradually re-read the Discworld series.

I think Pyramids often slips through the cracks when people talk about Discworld novels, I might be wrong. It’s not one that features any of the recurring characters – there’s no Rincewind or Nanny Ogg, for example – but it’s an important one. Sitting seventh in the published order it marked Terry’s first move away from the Wizzards and Witches that had dominated thus far. Prior to re-reading this one I’d done the same with Sourcery and couldn’t help feeling that perhaps even the writer was getting a little tired of the theme. Pyramids was one of the first in what’s now called the ‘cultures’ series as well as the exploration of belief on the Discworld.

Like many of those pre, say, Men At Arms, I had only vague recollections of Pyramids having read it originally some two decades ago and not since. Of course I remembered Pteppic and You Bastard, the Disc’s greatest living mathematician and – as with all of those I’ve revisited in the last couple of years – reading this one again was a real joy. Preatchett really was in a league of his own and to sit there chuckling away at this one served just to remind how much of a loss it is to no longer receive the joy of a new Discworld novel every year or so.




*I cannot recommend this one enough, just make sure you get a good translation as I’ve seen far too many bland ones on the shelf that seem to suck the passion and charm out of the prose.

8 thoughts on “Page Turning – Three More

  1. I read quite a bit but I’ve never taken one of those challenges. Reason being I would find it to be a tremendous pain in the arse to meet deadlines for reading. Granted you read more but it seems costly, time-wise. I read ‘Lolita’ a few years ago (along with others like David Copperfield) as I wanted to write a first-person novel and wanted to see how it was done. I, too, found it to be an extraordinary and disturbing book. (Somewhat bowdlerized for the movie.) Interestingly I found an edition that had tons of explanatory footnotes as to what Nabokov was talking about.) Obligatory song references – Sting, of course, refers to ‘that book by Nabokov’ in ‘Don’t Stand So Close To Me.’ And Mick Jagger was inspired to write ‘Sympathy for the Devil’ after reading “Master and Margarita,” a book I’d never heard of prior to that.

    • Ah I set the challenge upon myself but use Goodreads to keep track. Events toward the end of last year meant there was a period I couldn’t read or take anything in but still cleared close to that many.
      I didn’t know about Jagger’s inspiration (it was only published – in a censored version – in ’67) but I did know that it inspired Pearl Jam’s ‘Pilate’ from the Yield record.

    • My wife can’t stand Tom Cruise. She’s always referred to him as a ‘punk.’ His personal life aside, I have no real problem with him. He’s a good actor when he puts his mind to it. One of my favorite movies ever is ‘Jerry Maguire.’ Thought everybody was great in that.

      • I guess he’s not big with the wives. When you read a book you kinda get a picture of the character in your mind. Sometimes the films get it right and sometimes they, .. well you know. What’s new on ME?

      • Actually I always thought it was the ladies who liked Cruise. Me, I’m working no what I think is a pretty interesting piece that turned into a mini-series for reasons you’ll see. Stay tuned. Sorry to grab your space here, Tony.

      • I think Tom Cruise is hit and miss. For every Rain Man / Maguire / Magnolia there’s a Tom Cruise as Tom Cruise Running film.
        Problem is that I saw the first Reacher movie before reading a word and it’s hard to shake the image of the diminutive chap when reading now, even if Reacher is approximately 2.5 Tom Cruise’s nailed together.
        No worries on the space grab, looking forward to the mini-series too

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s